Reapit in Australia & New Zealand

Short-term rentals like Airbnb may offer quick cash, but what’s the long-term cost for the Australian real estate market? Explore the impact on tenants, supply and your portfolio.
“Why rent it for $550 a week when I could Airbnb it for $250 a night?”
If you work in property management, you’ve definitely heard something like that.
Maybe from an investor at an open home. Maybe from your own landlords.
And sure, the logic checks out…until it doesn’t.

Let’s chat about what’s really going on in the short-term rental boom, and why long-term rental agents (like you) are stuck cleaning up the mess.
A growing number of Aussie investors are pulling out of the long-term market to chase quick cash from holiday lets.
In fact, a 2024 study by Grounded Community Land Trust Advocacy found that in the Whitsundays, Airbnb hosts were pulling in a median annual gross income of $131,000 – with net income sitting around $85,475. That’s a massive 80%+ more than what a long-term lease would typically generate for the same property (realestate.com).
That’s a big chunk of the housing taken off the long-term market.
Right…Airbnb’s 2023-24 Urbis report claimed STRs only account for 1-2% of housing nationally, and don’t significantly affect rents or supply (Airbnb Newsroom).
But independent researchers – like Professor Nicole Gurran at the University of Sydney – argue otherwise. She points to “strong evidence” that STRs do reduce availability and raise prices, especially in regional and lifestyle suburbs (ABC News).
Her take? In areas where councils have capped or banned STRs, rents have stabilised.
Draw your own conclusions…
When an owner pulls their property out of your portfolio to “go Airbnb,” you don’t just lose management fees. You also lose:
Then, six months later, they return – burnout from managing bookings, cleaners and complaints – and the property is:
You’re left trying to re-lease a ghost listing with outdated photos and flaky electricals. Fun!
Honestly? With patience and a few solid facts.
Here’s what works in the real world:
Gross income doesn’t equal net profit.
Reapit gives you access to analytics that show actual income, vacancy rates and arrears. Use it.
Short-term doesn’t mean no rules.
In fact, it often means more.
These are real shifts. Best to be across them before an owner’s holiday-rental dreams hit red tape.
Some owners want flexibility.
Offer:
You keep the listing, they still get premium returns.
In high-demand areas where long-term stock has shrunk – often because of a spike in short-term listings – tenants are under pressure.
And when rent is up, competition is fierce and options are limited, even small issues like bond deductions or delayed repairs can feel bigger than they are.
That stress often lands squarely on your team.
It’s not that STRs directly cause more complaints or maintenance requests. But in regions where long-term renting has become harder, every touchpoint matters more.
Short-term rentals aren’t the enemy. But they do pull at the fabric of the long-term rental market.
And while some owners chase quick returns, it’s up to you – the property manager – to be the voice of reason.
Not to lecture them. Not to scare them. Just to show them the full picture.
Because at the end of the day, it’s not about nightly rates.
It’s about trust. Longevity. Stability.
And that’s what long-term property management still delivers best.
Not every property is suited to a short-term strategy. And not every investor has the time (or patience) to be a host.
Use the chart below to help your landlords weigh up the pros and cons of each approach – from income to involvement, compliance and risk.
Because better decisions start with a clearer picture.
| Category | Short-Term Rental (STR) | Long-Term Rental (LTR) |
|---|---|---|
| Rental Income (Peak Season) | High (e.g. $250+/night) | Moderate (e.g. $550-$750/week) |
| Rental Income (Off-Peak) | Low or none | Stable year-round |
| Vacancy Risk | High (seasonal swings) | Low (especially with quality tenants) |
| Management Complexity | High (bookings, cleaning, guest issues) | Low (standardised processes) |
| Regulatory Pressure | Increasing (levies, caps, bans) | Stable (clear residential tenancy laws) |
| Maintenance Frequency | Frequent (between guests) | Scheduled (e.g. quarterly inspections) |
| Tenant Quality | Varies (guests, not tenants) | High (screened, references provided) |
| Income Predictability | Low - income fluctuates | High - consistent weekly rent |
| Cleaning Costs | High (after every stay) | Low (tenant handles cleaning) |
| Furnishing Required | Yes (fully furnished) | Optional (unfurnished standard) |
| Compliance Requirements | Minimal, unless used for longer stays | Strict (RTA, safety, compliance) |
| Owner Involvement | High (daily/weekly oversight needed) | Low (set and forget) |
| Portfolio Stability | Low - properties often churn in and out | High - reliable long-term income |
.png)


